home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.std.c
- Path: in2.uu.net!world!mv!usenet
- From: ENGR@GSSI.MV.COM (Michael Furman)
- Subject: Integral conversion e.t.c. (was: Re: Hungarian notation)
- Message-ID: <DLoy4x.AFG@mv.mv.com>
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Organization: GSSI
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 15:10:08 GMT
- References: <30C40F77.53B5@swsbbs.com> <SPENCER.96Jan22113215@zorgon.ERA.COM> <4e1nd8$hv0@solutions.solon.com> <3104bfc8.132251392@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <4e2ppd$lsu@solutions.solon.com> <DLnG5H.748@mv.mv.com>
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.10
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: gssi.mv.com
-
- Could somebody please clarify is "C" standard so strict and does not let
- use some constructions that "C++" draft stadard let? Namely:
-
- 1. Integer conversion when source value can not be represented in destination
- type. In C++ it is defined. In case of both unsigned types it completely
- defined in standard; othervise details of "how it will be converted" must
- be defined by implementation.
-
- 2. Implementation extention: additional forms of function main, like:
-
- int main(int argc, char * * argv, char * env);
-
- In C++ draft standard said that any implementation must allow 2 kinds if
- "main" definitions, but does not forbid extentions.
-
- Thanks in advance,
- Michael
-
-
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Michael Furman, (603)893-1109
- Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. fax:(603)889-3984
- 13 Klein Drive - P.O. Box 97 engr@gssi.mv.com
- North Salem, NH 03073-0097 71543.1334@compuserve.com
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-
-